Section 1 — Student Information
|
Student Name:
|
TEACHER USE ONLY
|
Course: TFJ
|
Due Date:
|
Final Grade:
|
Teacher: Mr. Ferguson
|
School: Renfrew Collegiate Institute
|
Date: _______________
|
|
Section 2 — Overall Demonstration of Learning
|
N/A
Not Applicable
|
I
Inc.
|
R
Remedial
|
Level 1
Missed the Mark!
|
Level 2
Getting There!!
|
Level 3
On Target!!!
|
Level 4
Bulls Eye!!!!
|
N/A
|
20% or 30%
|
|
R+
R
R-
|
45%
40%
35%
|
|
1+
1
1-
|
59-57%
56-54%
53-50%
|
|
2+
2
2-
|
69-67%
66-64%
63-60%
|
|
3+
3
3-
|
79-77%
76-74%
73-70%
|
|
4+
4
4-
|
99-95%
94-87%
86-80%
|
|
Section 3 — Ecotourism Adventure Package and Activity
|
Criteria
Description
|
I
Inc.
|
R
Remedial
|
Level 1
Missed the Mark!
|
Level 2
Getting There!!
|
Level 3
On Target!!!
|
Level 4
Bull’s Eye!!!!
|
proposal
proposal
should be professional, have good use of colour, appropriate detail, and a
good impact
|
inc.
|
proposal is not
commensurate to the grade level
|
weak proposal, not very
professional, lacking colour, detail, and impact.
|
proposal is somewhat
professional, includes some colour and some detail, and has minimal impact.
|
proposal is professional,
includes good use of colour, appropriate detail and has a good impact
|
proposal is highly
professional, has excellent use of colour (wheel theory applied), thoughtful
details and a solid impact
|
required elements
all required
elements present
|
inc.
|
missing more than 3
elements
|
missing no more than 3
elements
|
missing no more than 2
elements
|
no elements missing
|
all elements present and
expanded upon
|
researches and gathers information
related information
should be collected
|
inc.
|
proper research is not
apparent
|
does not collect any
information relating to the topic
|
collects very little
information— some relates to the topic
|
collects some basic
information — most relates to the topic
|
collects a great deal of
information — all relates to the topic
|
quality
work product
should be polished and complete
|
inc.
|
Quality of work is not
commensurate to the grade level
|
work was routinely of poor
quality and lacked a sense of pride
|
work product was
frequently unpolished and/or incomplete
|
work product was usually
polished and complete
|
work product was of
extremely high quality
|
ambition
a drive to
complete the project should be evident
|
inc.
|
demonstrated no interest
or motivation
|
was regularly
disinterested and unmotivated
|
often seemed disinterested
or unmotivated
|
regularly exhibited a
drive to complete the project
|
was extremely eager to
plan and execute the project
|
on task
should be on
task without requiring reminders
|
inc.
|
is rarely on task
|
needs frequent teacher
reminders to get on task.
|
is on task some of the time.
Needs teacher reminders
|
is on task most of the
time. Does not need any teacher reminders
|
is on task all of the
time. Does not need any teacher reminders
|
curb appeal
overall
package should be appealing and professional looking
|
inc.
|
overall package is not
commensurate to the grade level
|
package is somewhat
complete, but not appealing or professional
|
package is mostly complete
mostly appealing and professional
|
package is complete
appealing and professional
|
package is complete and
expanded upon, highly appealing and professional, bound in a solid
presentation
|
knowledge and understanding
|
|
|
is lacking information in
this activity.
|
has most of the required
information for the activity.
|
includes all required
information for the activity.
|
expands on all required
info. with pictures, maps, etc.
|
thinking/inquiry
|
|
|
limited ability in the
transfer of information/ concepts into new contexts for presentation
|
some ability in the
transfer of information/concepts into new contexts for presentation
|
good ability in the transfer
of information/concepts into new contexts for presentation
|
exceptional ability in the
transfer of information/ concepts into new contexts for presentation
|
communication
|
|
|
limited clarity, limited
sense of purpose, inappropriate language, weak command of topic, limited
creativity in presenting ideas, audience is not engaged
|
moderate clarity, some
sense of purpose, uses moderately appropriate language, moderate command of
topic, adequate creativity, audience has limited engagement
|
considerable clarity,
clear sense of purpose, uses germane vernacular, good command of topic, good
creativity, audience is mostly engaged
|
excellent clarity, strong
sense of purpose, uses excellent germane vernacular, excellent command of
topic, excellent creativity, audience is highly engaged and eager
|
application
|
|
|
poor use of: handout/
instruction sheet, poor margins, sentences, spelling, punctuation, and
capitalization
|
developing: margins,
sentences, spelling, punctuation, and capitalization
|
correct use of: margins,
sentences, spelling, punctuation, capitalization
|
excellent use of: handout/
instruction sheet, mastery of: margins, sentences, spelling, punctuation,
capitalization
|
application
|
|
|
poor: eye contact, body
language (slouches, fidgets, verbal tics)
|
developing: better eye
contact, body language (slouches, fidgets, verbal tics)
|
good: eye contact, body
language (slouches, fidgets, verbal tics).
|
excellent: eye contact,
body language (slouches, fidgets, verbal tics)
|
application
|
|
|
poor: anecdotes, humor
|
developing: anecdotes, humor
|
good: anecdotes, humor
|
excellent: anecdotes, humor
|
overall expectations met:
|
A1 | A3 | B3 | B4 | C1 | C2 | D2 | D3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|